Commuters' anger as Government warns regional rail fares could soar to pay for improved services

CONCERN: Tim Calow, chairman of  Aire Valley Rail Users' Group, who has warned that fare hikes will increase traffic congestion

CONCERN: Tim Calow, chairman of Aire Valley Rail Users' Group, who has warned that fare hikes will increase traffic congestion

First published in News
Last updated

RAIL passenger groups reacted with anger last night as the Transport Secretary warned regional fares might have to soar to pay for better services.

Proposals to wipe out fare differences across the country would see the price of tickets climb on cheaper Northern routes, Patrick McLoughlin admitted.

Commuters in West Yorkshire pay up to 60 per cent less than in other parts of the country for short journeys, according to the Department for Transport, although ticket prices are partly subsidised by a Council Tax precept.

For example, an annual season ticket for the ten mile journey between Bradford and Huddersfield is £952 – but Bath to Bristol, a similar distance, costs £1,504.

Asked, by the Telegraph & Argus, if he was ruling out bringing all fares into line, Mr McLoughlin said: “I’m not, er - I’m not actually ruling it in either.”

The proposal is buried in plans for the new Northern Rail and Trans-Pennine franchises, which are due to be awarded late next year and to start in February 2016.

Northern transport bosses say the difference is justified because of lower incomes in the region – as well as by the older trains passengers must use.

But ministers have vowed that these 30-year-old ‘Pacer’ trains – condemned as “cattle trucks” by critics – will finally be replaced, as part of the new contract to run services.

A consultation document for the franchises highlights how ticket prices in the North are “significantly below” prices elsewhere in the country.

And it asks: “What are your views on increasing below-average fares over time to levels on the rest of the network in order to improve the frequency, capacity and quality of local services?”

Quizzed about the plan at Westminster, Mr McLoughlin said: “It’s a consultation document and we are asking for views on it.”

But he added: “I want to see improved services. We are investing a lot of money into rail in the North – the Northern Hub and the new Trans-Pennine services

“There will be more pressure for better services across those areas and, eventually, better rolling stock for those areas too.”

But the threat of much higher fares was immediately attacked by rail passenger groups.

Bradford Rail Users' Group spokesman James Vasey said lower prices reflected much lower investment in the network.

“People in the South are paying more because they are getting more Government spending – about three times as much in the South-East," Mr Vasey said.

“If they push up fares in the North, then they need to triple investment. It will also move people back into cars and make congestion worse.”

Tim Calow, chairman of the Aire Valley Rail Users' Group, said: "This is a big concern.

"The rail fares have gone up more in West Yorkshire in recent years.

"I don't agree with the fare comparisons being made with West Yorkshire and London. The region is more comparable with the West Midlands, around Birmingham.

"The quality of the service is rubbish compared to London.

"Any changes would lead to enormous traffic issues. Bad enough as it is in Saltaire at the moment. We need to keep the cars out of the city centre.

"People would be more likely to go by car if the fail fares went up. In Bradford there is more room for people to park there."

The row could damage George Osborne’s attempt to woo Northern voters by proposing a ‘HS3’ high-speed rail line across the Pennines.

Rail chiefs also recently admitted plans to electrify the route between York, Bradford and Manchester – allowing faster, ‘greener’ services – are in jeopardy, because of doubts over the cost.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:58pm Fri 25 Jul 14

lilnor05 says...

I am a regular train user with my young son and use the trains nearly everyday to get to work as I don't drive. On hearing this I am appalled because I feel that the service we already get is not up to standard. The trains are barely on time and I worked out when a train home at 23:45 was incredibly late, after a long day at work, that on average I spend in a year, an extra 48 hours waiting for trains that are late.... The prices should not be raised until they stop being late so often...
I am a regular train user with my young son and use the trains nearly everyday to get to work as I don't drive. On hearing this I am appalled because I feel that the service we already get is not up to standard. The trains are barely on time and I worked out when a train home at 23:45 was incredibly late, after a long day at work, that on average I spend in a year, an extra 48 hours waiting for trains that are late.... The prices should not be raised until they stop being late so often... lilnor05
  • Score: 4

6:17pm Fri 25 Jul 14

Skipton Ratepayer says...

Agreed. We should not have to pay more until/unless the service improves. Last Tuesday the ticket machine wasn't working and no guard came down the train so we had almost 15 minutes added to our journey queueing for a ticket at Leeds. On the way back the train was delayed by half an hour leaving Leeds, very crowded and horribly hot. The guard did keep apologising, but it's not the actual train staff who set the fares.
Agreed. We should not have to pay more until/unless the service improves. Last Tuesday the ticket machine wasn't working and no guard came down the train so we had almost 15 minutes added to our journey queueing for a ticket at Leeds. On the way back the train was delayed by half an hour leaving Leeds, very crowded and horribly hot. The guard did keep apologising, but it's not the actual train staff who set the fares. Skipton Ratepayer
  • Score: 5

11:32pm Sun 27 Jul 14

lab says...

If the conductors actually bothered to collect fares / check tickets perhaps the increases would not be required. The times I have been on the train when it has been busy and the conductor has not been bothered to collect fares / check tickets is in the majority.
If the conductors actually bothered to collect fares / check tickets perhaps the increases would not be required. The times I have been on the train when it has been busy and the conductor has not been bothered to collect fares / check tickets is in the majority. lab
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree