News RSS Feed


‘Russian roulette’ alert over railway crossings


Motorists and pedestrians in the district are risking their lives by playing “Russian roulette” with 200-tonne trains at railway level crossings, it has emerged.

New figures show four incidents of level crossing misuse were reported on the Airedale line during 2009, although Network Rail fears the real figure could be much higher as many go unreported.

In June, a pedestrian had a lucky escape after what rail chiefs described as a “near miss” at Kildwick level crossing. Less than two miles away, at Cononley, there were three instances of level crossing misuse during the year – one involving a vehicle and two involving pedestrians.

And this year has already seen one high-profile incident which led to police giving strong words of advice to a 13-year-old boy who was egged on by friends to play “chicken” with an oncoming train at Cononley crossing.

Now Network Rail, which operates Britain’s rail infrastructure, has released a series of alarming images showing the unnecessary risks people take at level crossings.

And Iain Coucher, chief executive of Network Rail, has called on the Government to do more to curb unsafe driving at level crossings.

He said the driving theory test should include questions on level crossings to enhance learner drivers’ understanding of the Highway Code and stamp out behaviour such as dodging barriers and running red lights.

Mr Coucher said: “Motorists are too often playing Russian roulette with a 200-tonne train – and tragically some lose their lives gambling at level crossings by running red lights or dodging around barriers.”

Comments(9)

JHeaton says...
5:21pm Sat 20 Mar 10

Not condoning such risk taking ---BUT it can be so frustrating waiting at these crossings because the barriers come down too early, ie when the approaching train is still miles away- so one can sit there waiting for 5 minutes before the train passes. Network Rail should invest in a better system.

paul64 says...
7:44pm Sat 20 Mar 10

There is no better system. The line speed is 90MPH It takes a EMU unit used on the Airedale line about 0.5 to 0.75 of a mile to stop at that speed when emergency brakes are applied. Under normal line adhesion and controlled braking conditions the signal distance from the crossing is correct.

The answer is a bridge. Failing that the next best thing is to time the trains better. At the moment trains pass at Steeton. This means that the barriers are down when for example a Leeds bound train is aproaching Cononley. By the time that train has passed Kildwick the Skipton bound train is in the area. Therefore you tend to find the barriers down at least four times per hour for at least 6 mins each time whilst two trains pass, and that is just for the local trains. Add freight to the equation and the problem is multiplied. A simple retiming would buy a few extra minutes for the barriers to be open.

That said there is still no excuse for air heads to jump the barriers.

murff says...
9:35pm Sun 21 Mar 10

A bridge isn't going to happen (short of our allowing to cover every square inch of fields round here in new houses). But the timing idea is intriguing. So would slowing down the line speed.

The real question is whether Network Rail are bothered enough to do anything about it.

paul64 says...
7:40am Mon 22 Mar 10

Dropping the line speed is not the answer. Slowing trains would just mean they take longer to arrive at the crossing. Without altered signalling it would make the situation worse. In a nutshell network rail don't really care about Joe Bloggs sat in traffic at Kildwick.

murff says...
8:41pm Mon 22 Mar 10

Maybe it is time they started getting invoiced for wasted time and fuel.

Skiptoner says...
3:44pm Tue 23 Mar 10

Maybe people should stop moaning. The railways should be applauded for working to increase the appeal of public transport and reduce the impacts of travel on the planet. it looks like the people complaning are those who can't be bothered to get out of their cars and use the other options.
if you feel your fuel and time are being wasted there are alternative routes that use bridges to cross this busy railway line.

matt64 says...
12:26pm Thu 25 Mar 10

I have to agree with J Heaton from Cowling that it is frustrating waiting for the trains to pass, at 4.55pm last week I waited 17 minutes and 3 trains went through. However generally I can accept a wait of 6 mins and take it as a chill out time. In response to the 'Skiptoner' perhaps we would stop moaning if a railway station was allowed in Cross Hills as at least then we would experience the benefit of train travel, but I would be more likely to shop in Leeds than get in my car to go to Skipton.

JHeaton says...
2:24pm Sat 27 Mar 10

Soon after a local train leaves Skipton the Kildwick/Crosshills barriers come down. The train then stops at Cononley, barriers remaining down. I'm told that this is because the 'system' cannot differentiate between the local train and, say, an express travelling at the 90mph linespeed all the way, and has to assume that all trains are express, erring on the side of caution. In reality there is no point in the barriers being down while the train is stopped at Cononley, but they are for the reason above. To see efficient use of crossing barriers, need to look at France or Germany, Network Rail are 'health & safety' obsessed..

JHeaton says...
2:33pm Sat 27 Mar 10

I should have added - I AM a rail user, normally from Steeton station, and it would be brilliant if the station at Crosshills could be re-built & re-opened and a road bridge put in. In fact it would be so good I would be prepared to see a housing estate built , if that's the price...!...


Drivers wait at the Kildwick level crossing Drivers wait at the Kildwick level crossing

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses